Roger and Jim, I wanted to update you on a recent development that emerged last week in follow-up to a meeting with Dan Rosenfeld, Senior Deputy for Economic Development, Sustainability and Mobility - County of Los Angeles. I wanted to keep you in the loop because this specific initiative closely parallels what you are working on as Chairs of the AIA/LA Political Outreach Committee, and if possible - I'd like to involve you in their ongoing discussions so that it helps inform your own efforts to drive the POC's initiatives forward.
On Thursday, June 18 (2pm) AIA/LA Practice Committee Chair Hraztan Zeitlian, AIA (LEO A DALY) and Co-Chair Kelly Olson (AECOM) held a conference call to discuss their committee's objective to develop a white paper on County of LA architecture procurement recommendations. Participants in this discussion included (in addition to Hraztan and Kelly): Kirk Rose, AIA (SMITHGROUP); John Friedman, FAIA (JFAK Architects); Melanie McArtor, AIA (GENSLER); Danette Riddle (AECOM); Will Wright (AIA/LA) and Seena Hassouna on behalf of Hal Sibley, AIA (HMC Architects).
The group will meet to further discuss the following agenda on Thursday, July 2 (8:30am) at AECOM over breakfast.
Please let me know if you can make plans to attend. Although I feel this initiative may well progress on its own parallel track to your ongoing initiatives, I wanted to make certain that you were well aware of other AIA/LA committee efforts (especially when they thematically overlap).
Topics to discuss on Thursday, July 2 (8:30am) at AECOM include:
County of Los Angeles - Recommendations for Architectural Projects Procurement
- · Outreach to Design Firms / seek to broaden the pool of candidates
· Establish Standards/metrics of Design Excellence
· Criteria for architecture selection to include: - 1. Design Excellence – relative to project requirements
2. Sustainability
3. Experience with public agencies
4. Local/small business/disadvantaged business other
5. other - · Consider a Design Review Board in the Selection Process and on-going for periodic review of projects
· Enhance the weighting of the Design Excellence where appropriate
· Balance/reduce weighting of prior experience in the Selection Criteria with other key criterion to enable a broader range of firms to be considered - · Provide Feedback regarding All submitted qualifications
· Empower the Design Review Board with the ability to have enough influence to counterbalance purely management driven decision-making vis a vis Architecture with the requirement of the artistic public benefit of projects. - · Discussion on design competition for special projects
· Create a small firm empowerment project category, where collaboration with small firms is encouraged.
· Enhance the Public Art component beyond existing standards and prescribe the early integration of Art with the project development
No comments:
Post a Comment